Plant-covered roofs have become a regular sight in Portland, Oregon and new research shows that residents are prepared to pay for more of them.

The US city of Portland is a leader in incorporating green infrastructure for stormwater management, including free street trees, rebates for small residential housing footprints, and green roofs. Green roofs, also known as rooftop gardens or ecoroofs, typically have a layer of plants growing in soil on top of the roof, as well as material for waterproofing, structural support, and insulation.

A study from Reed College in collaboration with the University of Illinois (UoI) and Portland State University explores the benefits of green roofs and how much Portland residents are willing to pay to increase the number of green roofs across the city.

“Countries around the world are investing significant public resources to reduce the impact of stormwater runoff,” explains Amy Ando, professor of agricultural and consumer economics at UoI, and a co-author on the study.

“Green roofs are part of that solution because they capture some of the rain that would otherwise end up in sewage systems. Knowing the benefits from investing in green roofs is important for implementing sound public policies.”

Like many cities, extreme rainfall events in Portland can quickly overwhelm old sewer systems and lead to flooding, which impacts surface water quality as well as transportation and properties. The study investigates how much people would pay for benefits that include reducing the number of occasions these combined sewage and stormwater overflow (CSO) events occur, along with reducing urban heat island effect, and increased presence of pollinators like bees and butterflies.

“Although CSO events have declined dramatically in Portland after a major system upgrade - US$1.4 billion Big Pipe Project - they still happen,” says Noelwah Netusil, professor of economics at Reed College and lead author on the paper. “Our findings show that survey respondents place the largest value on reducing CSO events further and are willing to support additional funding for this.”

Since 2018, the city of Portland has required new buildings in the central city with a footprint over 20,000 square feet (1,858m²) to have an ecoroof covering 100% of the area (minus a few exceptions like solar panels and evacuation routes) to further protect the city from flooding. Most green roofs are concentrated in the city centre, covering 1.4 million square feet (130,000m²).

Survey respondents indicated how much they would pay for a green roof to result in a scale of benefits. For example, it would cost more to decrease sewer overflows three times per year rather than two, lower the air temperature by over one degree rather than half a degree, and bring in a significant amount of bees, birds, and butterflies rather than keep pollinators at the same level.

For green roofs to reduce average temperatures by more than 1 degree Fahrenheit, reduce sewer overflows by three per year, and increase pollinators by 150%, respondents were willing to pay US$442.40 per household. That amounts to $116.8 million for the city of Portland.

For green roofs to reduce summer temperatures by less than 0.5 degrees, reduce sewer overflow by one, and increase pollinators by 50%, residents were willing to pay US$202.40 per household or US$54.4 million total for Portland. The cost would be added in monthly instalments to their sewage and stormwater utility bill for one year and green roofs would be installed a year after the programme was fully funded.

While survey respondents who had visited or seen a green roof had the highest estimated willingness to pay to support the programme described in the survey, respondents who knew nothing about green roofs prior to taking the survey were still supportive of the green roof programme. Furthermore, people generally preferred ecoroofs to be more equally spread out across the city rather than concentrated in the city centre.

“Reducing CSO events had the largest value for all survey respondents – whether they had visited, seen, heard, or knew nothing about green roofs prior to taking the survey,” Netusil explains. “The total estimated benefits from the programmes we examined would be sufficient to more than double the number of green roofs on commercial and industrial properties in our study area, Portland.”

Eliana Brown, University of Illinois Extension and Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant water quality specialist, says the study’s results will be included on a new green stormwater infrastructure website.

“When municipalities in Illinois contact us because they’re interested in applying green infrastructure, they want to know how the public will benefit from their investment,” Brown states. “This new research on green roofs goes beyond Portland, giving gives stormwater professionals more tools to advocate for practices that are valuable for communities across Illinois and elsewhere.”

The paper, “Valuing the public benefits of green roofs,” is published in Landscape and Urban Planning [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104426]. Authors include Noelwah Netusil, Lauren Lavelle, Sahan Dissanayake, and Amy Ando.

The research is funded by the Bernard Goldhammer Grant for Research on Economics and Natural Resources, Reed College and the Stendal Fund for Economics, Reed College. This paper is also based in part on work funded by the USDA-NIFA W4133 Multistate Research Grant 1008843.
https://aces.illinois.edu/news/green-roofs-are-worth-cost-urban-residents